Thawing of permafrost may disturb historic cattle burial grounds in East Siberia

CLUSTER: VULNERABLE POPULATIONS IN THE ARCTIC

Thawing of permafrost may disturb historic cattle burial grounds in East Siberia

Boris A. Revich* and Marina A. Podolnaya

Institute of Forecasting, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

Climate warming in the Arctic may increase the risk of zoonoses due to expansion of vector habitats, improved chances of vector survival during winter, and permafrost degradation. Monitoring of soil temperatures at Siberian cryology control stations since 1970 showed correlations between air temperatures and the depth of permafrost layer that thawed during summer season. Between 1900s and 1980s, the temperature of surface layer of permafrost increased by 2–4°C; and a further increase of 3°C is expected. Frequent outbreaks of anthrax caused death of 1.5 million deer in Russian North between 1897 and 1925. Anthrax among people or cattle has been reported in 29,000 settlements of the Russian North, including more than 200 Yakutia settlements, which are located near the burial grounds of cattle that died from anthrax. Statistically significant positive trends in annual average temperatures were established in 8 out of 17 administrative districts of Yakutia for which sufficient meteorological data were available. At present, it is not known whether further warming of the permafrost will lead to the release of viable anthrax organisms. Nevertheless, we suggest that it would be prudent to undertake careful monitoring of permafrost conditions in all areas where an anthrax outbreak had occurred in the past.

Keywords: climate change; Arctic; anthrax; zoonoses; Russia

Received: 16 August 2011; Revised: 13 October 2011; Accepted: 22 October 2011; Published: 21 November 2011

Citation: Global Health Action 2011, 4: 8482 - DOI: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.8482

Global Health Action 2011. © 2011 Boris A. Revich and Marina A. Podolnaya. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Climate change in the Arctic may increase the risk of propagation of zoonoses due to expansion of vector habitats, development of more favorable climatic conditions for their survival during winter season, increases in average air temperatures, and permafrost degradation. Between 1900s and 1980s, the temperature of surface layer of permafrost increased by 2–4°C (1), and a further increase of 3°C is expected (2). The second half of the 20th century was marked by accelerated increases in the temperature of the upper layer of permafrost and the depth of seasonal melting layer. Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring network (http://www.udel.edu/Geography/calm) includes 20 Russian stations, all of which reported increases in the annual average temperatures of upper permafrost layer since 1970s. The magnitude of the increase varied from 1.2–2.8°C in Russian European North, to 1.0°C in the north of West Siberia, to 1.4–1.8°C in Central and South Yakutia, and to 1.3°C in other regions of East Siberia (3, 4). Various climate models predict the change in summer temperatures to be between 2.7 and 3.8°C in Yakutia cities by 2020. As the permafrost temperatures in Yakutia increase, permafrost degradation becomes evident. For example, the depth of permafrost varies between 250 and 350 m in the center of this region (Yakutsk city). Under natural conditions, the depth of seasonal melting is 1.5–1.7 m for clay loams, 1.6–2.0 m for sand clays, and 2.0–2.5 m for sands. The temperature of surface layer of permafrost is predicted to increase by 1.5–2°C in West Siberia and Yakutia, and by 1.0–2.0°C in Chukotka and north regions of Far East (5). The measurements of air temperature and permafrost temperature at the depth of 1.6 m at 52 stationary monitoring stations in Siberia showed linear correlation between these variables (6). Frequently observed rock sagging under building and engineering structures in Yakutia is explained by the decomposition of thermokarst, frost heave, waterlogging, and flooding (7).

As a consequence of permafrost melting, the vectors of deadly infections of the 18th and 19th centuries may come back, especially near the cemeteries where the victims of these infections were buried (8). Frequently repeated outbreaks of anthrax caused death of 1.5 million deer in Russian North between 1897 and 1925 (9). Cases of anthrax among people or cattle have been reported in 28,986 settlements of the Russian Federation. There are also 13,885 cattle burial grounds, of which 4,961sites do not meet Federal veterinary and sanitary standards (10). Other literature sources reported that more than half of these burial grounds did not meet sanitary standards and indicated lack of interaction between the state sanitary inspections and veterinary services. Some burial grounds have lost their official records of buried cattle or epizootic maps (11). Many settlements do not exist any more and were erased from local sanitary databases. Other settlements have become almost deserted by people, who could potentially guide sanitary authorities in mapping the boundaries of the burial grounds (12). Many of the anthrax cattle burial grounds are located in Siberia, where 6,688 settlements received the status of ‘stationary adverse’ territories for the risk of this disease. Taking into account the vast territory of Siberia, the density of such settlements is quite low (1.1 per 1,000 km2), even though the absolute number of such settlements in Siberia is 2.5 times greater than in European Russia.

Among all the Arctic territories of the Russian Federation, Yakutia has the greatest number of settlements, where the outbreaks of anthrax have been registered in the past, which is explained by very intense breeding of reindeer and horses. Between 1906 and 2004, 270 settlements reported outbreaks of this disease (13). The greatest number of epizootic events was recorded in 1949, 1951, 1957, 1969, 1970, 1980, 1986–1988, and the last outbreak occurred in 1993. There were 21 casualties among Yakutia population between 1949 and 1996 due to anthrax contracted mostly from cattle and reindeer (14). The spores of Siberian Anthrax remain viable in permafrost for about 105 years (15). More than 30 years ago, Russian researchers confirmed viability of other microorganisms (fungus, diatoms, etc.) collected in Antarctic glacier samples (16). Other researchers observed metabolic activity of bacteria in permafrost at the temperature of about −20°C (17). The spores of the bacterium anthrax may survive for 50–70 years more in the samples excavated at the depth of 1 m below the level of seasonal thawing in permafrost, as was observed in one Yakutia district (18). Potential hazard of historic catle burial grounds was confirmed by the outbreaks of Siberian anthrax among domestic reindeer in the Taymyr region of Russian Arctic in 1969 and 1977 (19). Microbiological tests of 18,000-year-old mammoth tissues confirmed the presence of Bacillus non reactif (D. sphaericus), B. anthracis, B. cereus, B. anthracoides, and other bacteria (20), but repeated analyses did not detect pX01 and pX02 plasmids in the brain of the grown-up mammoth (the researchers associate virulent properties of Siberian anthrax with these plasmids). Other researchers observed a strain of Bacillus sp. in frozen ground samples dated 3 million years (21).

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis in the Archangelsk region of Russian European North showed that the influence of global warming on cryolite zone would be insignificant, provided that the rates of warming are small enough. However, higher rates of global warming could bring about destructive cryogenic processes (22). Mining, construction, or agricultural development of previously virgin areas around cattle burial grounds may result in infiltration of disease vectors in organs of people or animals. Consequently, a new natural locus of infection may emerge. The risk of infection is usually greater during dry years when the layer of soil in the cattle grazing areas weathers out and the spores of disease vectors can penetrate into the organs of domestic animals (23). Today, there are 1.2 million domestic reindeer in Russian North, or 62% of their global population, and about 1 million wild reindeer.

The objective of this research was to estimate the temperature trends near the burial grounds of cattle that died from anthrax in Yakutia. The territory of Yakutia was chosen for this project because of the greatest number of such sites there, compared to the other northern territories of the Russian Federation.

Materials and methods

Due to a very extensive territory of Yakutia (3,083,000 km2), it is hardly possible to estimate permafrost temperatures at all of its 200 cattle burial grounds, especially because most grounds are situated in very remote and hard-to-reach places. More than 40% of Yakutia territory is situated above the polar circle. We used the data of weather stations located in the same administrative districts as the burial grounds to estimate the trends in local air temperatures. The geographical coordinates (latitude, longitude, and altitude) and international identification indexes of all Yakutia weather stations are listed at the website of Russian Meteorological service (www.meteo.ru); their locations are available on the interactive map at http://www.3planeta.com/googlemaps/karty-google-maps.html. We retrieved the daily temperature data for these weather stations from the US National Climatic Data Centre website and selected years 1961–2010 as the study period. NCDC website maintains the most comprehensive archive of meteorological data collected all over the world up-to-date. The analysis of available archive data showed that only 17 out of 26 selected district weather stations reported their daily temperature data for all years between 1961 and 2010, whereas the data for the remaining 9 administrative districts were either incomplete or absent.

Regional models of climate change in Yakutia have been developed only at a very broad geographic scale. There are only two such models: one covers all territories to the north of 65°N and the other covers all territories to the south of 65°N. The baseline period for both models is 1951–1990. The first model reports the following changes in annual average temperatures relative to the baseline: 0.2°C for 1971–1980; 0.8°C for 1981–1990; and 0.1°C for 1991–2000. The second model reports the following temperature increments: 0.12°C for 1971–1980; 1.6°C for 1981–1990; and 0.3°C for 1991–2000 [(24). p. 14]. Such aggregated information was not sufficient to estimate the temperature trends in individual administrative districts. For this purpose, we used the records of daily temperatures for those 17 districts where such data were available. Even these datasets contained several periods of missing data and these were dealt in the following way. If, for any given year, more than 15% of daily data were missing, we excluded this year from the analysis. If 1 month of daily data were missing, we used daily temperatures during the same month of the preceding year and calculated the annual average temperature using these ‘proxy’ data. Then, the time series of annual average temperatures between 1961 and 2010 were tested for a linear trend using least squares method. Significance of regression coefficients was measured by Fisher's F-test. The calculations were performed with STATISTICA 6 software.

Results

The territory of Yakutia can be subdivided into four climate-geographic zones: west part from Laptev Sea to the south boundaries of the republic; central plains part; northeast part that includes the Arctic tundra and Novosibirsk islands; and south highlands part (www.atlas-yakutia.ru). The survey of cattle burial sites showed that most of them were located in the western part (112 sites) and in the central plains part (112 sites), whereas the smallest numbers (43 sites) were located in the east part, which is mostly occupied by mountains (Fig. 1).


Fig 1

Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of burial grounds of cattle that died (+) from anthrax in Yakutia.

The observed trends in the average annual temperatures in different parts of Yakutia in 1961–2010 are summarized in Table 1. This table contains only those administrative districts where sufficient meteorological information was available. The lowest air temperatures are typical for the east part, where the number of cattle burial grounds is the smallest. Statistically significant linear temperature trends were obtained for the eight administrative districts with the highest annual average temperatures. We calculated the change in the mean July temperatures between the ‘historic’ period 1961–1985 and the ‘current’ period 1986–2010. The smallest change was observed in Viluisky district, ΔT=0.6°C (Thistoric=17.9°C and Tcurrent=18.5°C). The greatest change was observed in Churapchinsky district, ΔT=1.0°C (Thistoric=17.9°C and Tcurrent=18.9°C). In Yakutsky district, the change between the mean July temperatures was ΔT=0.9°C (Thistoric=18.4°C and Tcurrent=19.3°C). It was interesting to observe that the annual warming rate in Viluisky district was also minimal among all studied districts (0.02°C/year), while the annual warming rate in Churapchinsky district was maximal (0.04°C/year).


Table 1. Descriptive statistics of annual and July average temperatures in 1961–2010 and linear trends in annual average for selected administrative districts of Yakutia with the greatest numbers of anthrax cattle burial grounds
Annual average July average
Administrative district (number of cattle burial grounds) Mean (°C) Min (°C) Max (°C) Trend (°C/year) Significance level Mean (°C) Min (°C) Max (°C)
West Yakutia (112), including
Viluisky (13) + Verhneviluisky (10) −8.6 −11.0 −6.4 0.04** <0.001 18.2 15.1 22.7
Bulunsky (1) −13.0 −17.8 −10.5 0.02 0.14 7.5 4.4 12.5
Nurbinsky (17) −8.3 −10.9 −5.4 0.04* 0.02 17.3 14.4 21.5
Suntarsky (6) −7.1 −10.2 −5.0 0.04* 0.01 18 14.9 21.7
Zhigansky (6) −11.2 −13.7 −9.0 0.02 0.09 16.1 12.3 21
Mirninsky (29) −7.1 −11.6 −4.2 0.02 0.16 17 13.8 20.5
Olekminsky (20) −6.0 −8.5 −4.1 0.02 0.13 18.1 14.9 21.8
Oleneksky (10) −11.6 −14.3 −8.4 0.02 0.11 14.9 11 19.5
Central Yakutia (112) including
Ust-Maisky (2) −8.7 −11.5 −5.1 0.04** 0.001 18.3 15.3 21.2
Khangalassky (9) −7.6 −10.0 −4.7 0.04** 0.001 17.7 14.4 21.4
Yakutsk (7) + Namsky (13) + Ust-Aldansky (20) + Gorny (17) −9.3 −12.3 −7.1 0.06** < 0.001 18.9 15.9 22.8
Amginsky (15) −10.0 −13.0 −6.9 0.04* 0.01 18.2 15.3 21.6
Churapchinsky (6) −10.2 −13.0 −7.1 0.04* 0.01 18.5 15.4 22.2
Kobaisky (13) −10.9 −13.9 −9.3 0.02 0.24 17.3 14.3 21.7
Tomponsky (3) −12.9 −18.0 −7.9 0.01 0.73 16 6 19.8
East Yakutia (43) including
Verkhoyansky (4) −14.5 −17.4 −9.7 0.01 0.39 15.9 11.8 21.5
Oimyakonsky (10) −15.5 −19.0 −9.7 −0.002 0.92 14.8 11.5 23.1
* p<0.05; **p<0.01.

Another characteristic of climate warming was the relative increase in the number of ‘very hot’ days defined as the days with average daily temperature above the respective long-term average for this date, calculated over the past 50 years. The proportions of such days (N) were calculated for the ‘historic’ and the ‘current periods’: N historic= 34.5% and N current= 52% in Viluisky district; N historic= 39.1% and N current= 56% in Yakutsky district; N historic= 38.9% and N current= 52% in Churapchinsky district. Average daily temperatures in July 2010 were greater than the long-term average temperature of July during all 31 days of this month.

The ranges of annual average temperatures observed in different parts of Yakutia are shown in Fig. 2.


Fig 2

Fig. 2. The ranges of annual average temperatures observed in different parts of Yakutia.

The most pronounced temperature trend was observed in the administrative districts around Yakutsk city (Fig. 3). There are more than 50 cattle burial grounds in these districts.


Fig 3

Fig. 3. Annual average temperature trend in Yakutsk city.

Discussion

Statistical analysis confirmed a significant 0.1% level positive trend in the annual average temperatures in Yakutsk. Similar results have been obtained earlier (24): climate warming is more pronounced in Central and South Yakutia than in North Yakutia. The districts with the greatest increments of annual average temperatures also reported the highest numbers of outbreaks of anthrax: between 4 and 11 cases during the last 80 years. According to veterinary experts, these districts present the greatest risks of anthrax (14). From epidemiology standpoint, thorough monitoring of anthrax cattle burial grounds is recommended for the entire territory of Yakutia, not just for several selected parts. This monitoring should include regular surveys of cattle burial sites, checks of fences around them, inspections of land-use permits, and other documentation, detailed measurements of permafrost parameters around such sites. The trends in permafrost temperatures may vary greatly even within a single administrative district (24). Unfortunately, the authors could not find any information about the actual condition of Siberian anthrax cattle burial sites, cropping out the remains or soil erosion. The authors recommend thorough monitoring of activity of airborne anthrax both in the northern and southern parts of Yakutia, in the conditions of climate change, especially in light of the findings obtained in Central Asia (Kazakhstan), where geographic distribution of B. anthracis was studied (25).

Conclusions

More than 200 locations in Yakutia have previously reported outbreaks of anthrax among people. The same locations have burial grounds of cattle died from anthrax. Statistically significant positive trends in the annual average temperatures were established in 8 administrative districts out of 17 districts of Yakutia for which sufficient meteorological data were available. These eight districts should be carefully monitored in the first place, but all regions where the outbreaks of Siberian anthrax took place in the past should probably deserve equal attention of epidemiologists.

Gradual phaseout of these burial grounds should use modern technologies of utilization of cattle remains. Unfortunately, this is an extremely time-consuming and resource-consuming activity. It is quite important, therefore, to estimate the threshold temperatures above which depreservation of the frozen remains becomes significant. Temperature thresholds of permafrost degradation are estimated on the basis of geomorphological indicators (segregated frost heave mound – palsa), but they provide only indirect information about epidemiologic situation. Detailed field surveys on the state of cattle burial grounds and the measurements of air and permafrost temperatures are needed for objective assessment of epidemiologic situation. Besides, public health authorities should maintain permanent alertness with regard to anthrax. Massive vaccination of domestic animals has been proven to be effective to reduce the rates of this disease among both domestic animals and people living in the Russian Arctic.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers and invited editor professor Brigitta Evengård who thoroughly studied the original manuscript and provided advice that helped us to improve its quality. We also highlight personal involvement of the field editor of this journal.

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.

References

  1. Vasiliev AA, Drozdov DS, Moskalenko NG. Dynamics of perennial formations in West Siberia in relation to climate change. Earth Cryosphere 2008; 12: 10–18.
  2. Anisimov OA, Velichko AA, Demchenko PF, Eliseev AV, Mohov II, Nechaev VP. Influence of climate change on permafrost in the past, present and future. Phys Atmosp Oceans 2004; 38: 25–39.
  3. Pavlov AV. The current trends in temperatures of soils in Russian North. Earth Cryosphere 2008; 7: 22–27.
  4. Pavlov AV, Ananieva GV. Assessment of current changes in air temperatures in the cryolite zone of the Russian Federation. Earth Cryosphere 2004; 8: 3–9.
  5. Izrael YA, Pavlov AV, Anokhin YA, Myach LT, Sherstiukov BG. Statistical assessment of dynamics of climate elements in permafrost areas in the Russian Federation. Meteorol Hydrol 2006; 5: 27–38 (Russian).
  6. Romanovsky VE, Sazonova TS, Balobaev VT, Shender NI, Sergueev DO. Past and recent change in air and permafrost temperatures in eastern Siberia. Global and Planet. Change 2007; 56: 399–413.
  7. Anisimov OA, Belolutskaya MA, Grigor'ev MN, Instanes A, Korolev VA, Oberman NG, et al. Main environmental, social and economic consequences of climate change in permafrost areas: a forecast based on synthesis of observations and modeling, 2010; www.greenpeace.ru [cited 19 November 2009].
  8. Myglan VS, Vaganov EA. 2005. Epidemics and epizootic events in Siberia between the 17th and the first half of the 19th century, and long-term climate changes. Archaeology, ethnography and anthropology of Eurasia 2005; 4: 136–44 (Russian).
  9. Kazanovsky ES, Karabanov VP, Klebenson KA. Selected aspects of tundra ecosystems of European North part of the Russian Federation, and veterinary problems of deer breeding. Agricultural science of Euro-North-East 2006; 8: 189–92 (Russian).
  10. State report on sanitary and epidemiological situation in the Russian Federation in 2009, Moscow 2010 (Russian).
  11. Galkin VV, Loktionova MN, Simonova EG, Khadartsev OS. 2007. Problems of safety of Anthrax cattle burial grounds. Epidemiol Infec Dis 2007; 6: 54–56 (Russian).
  12. Gavrilov VA. Prospects of solution of the problem of biological hazard of Anthrax cattle burial grounds. Disinfec and Anti 2010; 1: 12–15 (Russian).
  13. Cadastre of Russian settlements characterized by persistent risk of Anthrax (2005) Handbook. In: Cherkassky BL ed., oscow: Intersen publishers (Russian).
  14. Karataeva TD, Vasilieve AA. 2007. Anthrax: epizootic situation and prevention in Republic Sakha (Yakutia). Veterinary Messenger 2007; 40–41: 106–12 (Russian).
  15. Repin VE, Pugachev VG, Taranov OS, Brenner EV. Potential hazard of microorganisms which came from the past. In: Boeskorov G.G, Tichonov A.N, and Suzuki N, eds. Yukagir mammoth. Saint-Petersburg; 2007, pp. 183–90 (Russian).
  16. Abyzov SS, Bobin NE, Kudriashov BB. Microbiologic research of a glacier in Central Antarctic. AnnUSSR Acad Sci, biological sciences series 1979; 6: 828–36 (Russian).
  17. Friedmann EI. Permafrost as microbial habitat. In: Viable microorganisms in permafrost. Pushcino: Russian Academy of Science; 1994, pp. 21–26.
  18. Bakulov IA, Frolova OA, Isaev EG. Further improvement of system of measures for prevention of epizootics of Siberian plague. Veterinaria 1997;7–11 (Russian).
  19. Laishev KA, Spesivtsev AV, Kechin VP. Fuzzy-modeling of probability of appearance of Siberian plague in Far North. Actual problems of nature management in Far North. Novosibirsk 2004; 175–81 (Russian).
  20. Safonova ON, Rodzikovsky AV, Dzhurgapova ZF. Results of microbiological tests of samples of muscle tissue of the back of Oymiakon baby mammoth. In: Abstracts of the 4th International Mammoth Conference. Yakutsk; 2006, p. 72 (Russian).
  21. Brushkov AV, Melnikov VP, Sukhovei YG, Griva GI, Repin VE, Kalenova LF. et al. Relict microorganism of permafrost as subjects of gerontology research. Adv Gerontol 2009; 22: 253–58 (Russian).
  22. Iglovsky SA Technogenic changes in geocryological conditions of the Dvinsko-Mezenskya plain and Kanin Peninsula. Earth's Cryosphere 2008; 1: 24–28 (Russian).
  23. Kershengoltz BM, Cherniavsky VF, Repin VE, Nikiforov OI, Sofronova ON. Influence of global climate changes on realization of potential of infectious diseases among population of Russian Arctic, an example of Yakutia. Human Ecol 2009; 6: 34–39 (Russian).
  24. Pavlov AV, Malkova GV. Current climate changes in Russian North: geographical scale maps., Novosibirsk: Geo Academic publishers; 2005 (Russian).
  25. Joner TA, Lukhonova L, Pazilov Y, Temiralyeva G, Hugh-Jones ME, Aikimbayev A, et al. Modeling the potential distribution of Bacillus anthracis under multiple climate change scenarios for Kazakhstan. PloS One, published March 09, 2010, 10.1371/journal.pone.0009596

*Boris A. Revich
Institute of Forecasting
Russian Academy of Sciences
Nachimovsky av, 47
RU-117 418, Moscow, Russia Federation
Tel: +7 499 129 18 00
Fax: +7 495 718 97 71
Email: revich@ecfor.ru

About The Authors

Boris A. Revich
MD, PhD,Prof
Russian Federation

Lab. of Environmental health Ins. of Forecasting

Marina A. Podolnaya

Russian Federation

Lab. of Environmantal health Ins. of Forecasting